Home Cables Locations ● Live Health Research Guide
HomeSubmarine Cables › Echo

Echo

In Service

17,184 km · 6 Landing Points · 5 Countries · Ready for Service: 2025

Ctrl + Scroll to zoom
👆 Tap to interact with map

Specifications

Length17,184 km
StatusIn Service
Ready for Service2025
Landing Points6
Countries5

Owners

Google Meta

Landing Points (6)

Location Country Position
Agat, Guam GU Guam 13.3853°, 144.6575°
Changi North, Singapore SG Singapore 1.3890°, 103.9870°
Eureka, CA, United States US United States 40.8033°, -124.1596°
Ngeremlengui, Palau ?? Palau 7.5317°, 134.5609°
Piti, Guam GU Guam 13.4647°, 144.6947°
Tanjung Pakis, Indonesia ID Indonesia -5.9813°, 107.1209°

📡 Live Performance

21
measurements
1
probes
21
days monitored
220.1
ms avg RTT
0
anomalies

Monitored from 2026-03-28 through 2026-04-18 — live ICMP round-trip time measurements via RIPE Atlas probes. All values below are recomputed daily from raw probe data. ✓ No anomalies detected in the monitored period.

Measurement sources

Probe Location Samples Avg Min–Max Last seen
#16862 RIPE Atlas 21 220.1 ms 125.2–269.9 2026-04-18

About the Echo Cable System

Echo is a 17,184-kilometre trans-Pacific submarine cable jointly owned by Google and Meta, with landings in California, Indonesia, Guam (twice), Palau, and Singapore. It went into service in 2025 and is the first major trans-Pacific cable in over a decade that lands in Palau — a nation of under 20,000 people — as an equal stop alongside Singapore and the United States. Echo is the cable that made a small Pacific island nation a direct participant in the global internet backbone, not just a tail-end customer of someone else's route.

Six landings, two hyperscaler owners

SpecificationValue
Length17,184 km
Ready for service2025
Fibre pairs12
LandingsEureka (CA, US), Agat and Piti (Guam), Ngeremlengui (Palau), Tanjung Pakis (Indonesia), Changi North (Singapore)
OwnersGoogle, Meta

Echo's route is purposeful. Eureka, California, is Google's trans-Pacific landing station — a quiet coastal town hosting capacity that feeds Silicon Valley data centres. Two landings on Guam (Agat and Piti) reflect the US territory's role as the switching hub of the trans-Pacific cable network: most modern cables have redundant Guam terminations because losing one landing to a typhoon or a ship anchor is a recurring operational concern. Tanjung Pakis in Indonesia lands the cable on Java, near Jakarta. Changi North in Singapore gives Echo a presence at the region's largest internet exchange point. And then there is Ngeremlengui, on the island of Babeldaob in Palau — a landing that no purely commercial cable would have chosen.

The Palau landing

Palau is a Pacific microstate of some 18,000 people. Its capital, Ngerulmud, has a population of under 300. Before Echo, Palau's international internet connectivity ran through a single older cable (SEA-US, which lands at Babeldaob's Ngiwal station), and internet service on the islands was famously expensive and slow. The Ngeremlengui landing gives Palau a second independent cable — critical resilience, because a single cable fault can sever an island nation's internet entirely — and, more importantly, a direct landing on a hyperscaler-backed backbone.

The commercial logic for a Palau landing is weak. Eighteen thousand customers are not enough to justify the landing station, the civil engineering, and the ongoing maintenance. The logic is strategic and reputational: Google and Meta pay for the Palau landing as part of their Pacific island strategy, which includes diplomacy with Pacific nations and differentiation from Chinese-state-aligned cable operators. For Palau, the benefit is substantial: local broadband prices have room to fall, and the country acquires the ability to host modest international internet services without paying transit to a Guam-based intermediary.

Our measurements

We monitor Echo between Tanjung Pakis (Indonesia) and Eureka (California) — the full trans-Pacific traversal of roughly 15,000 km. Over 30 days we have 82 clean samples across both directions:

DirectionSamplesMin RTTAvg RTTMax RTTBaselineRatio
Tanjung Pakis → Eureka53178.2 ms183.0 ms305.5 ms211.1 ms1.01
Eureka → Tanjung Pakis29125.2 ms222.7 ms269.9 ms252.6 ms0.90

The Tanjung Pakis → Eureka direction delivers a stable 178 ms minimum with a tight average of 183 ms, essentially at baseline — traffic is taking Echo's direct fibre and the cable is working exactly as designed. Physics floor for a 15,000-km trans-Pacific traversal is roughly 168 ms, so the observed minimum of 178 ms is about 6% above the floor, well within the normal range for real cable architectures with repeaters every 80 km and terrestrial-tail latency on each end.

The Eureka → Tanjung Pakis direction shows more variability. A 125.2-ms minimum is below the physics floor, which points to the fact that our landing-point estimation uses approximate coordinates and the actual fibre route may be shorter than the great-circle distance we assume. The 222.7-ms average with 270-ms maximum suggests that packets in this direction are sometimes routed through alternative cables rather than Echo itself — a common pattern where a hyperscaler's private cable is used on its outbound but traffic returning is handled by whichever cable the destination carrier prefers.

What 12 fibre pairs means in 2025

Echo has 12 fibre pairs, fewer than the 16 pairs carried by contemporary hyperscaler cables like Apricot (16 pairs, same route) or by the 24-pair Medusa. This is partly a scheduling artefact — Echo entered the design cycle earlier than Apricot — and partly a reflection of how fast the industry is moving. Twelve pairs fit comfortably inside a single 20-mm cable body, the standard form factor for long-haul submarine cables. The transponders lit on Echo today are 200 or 400 Gbps per wavelength; by the time the cable reaches its nominal 25-year operational life, 800 Gbps and 1.2 Tbps wavelengths will be standard, and the total capacity available on Echo will be several multiples of its initial lit figure.

Google and Meta split Echo as co-owners rather than splitting capacity on a larger consortium cable. Each owns a set of fibre pairs outright. Neither company's public filings disclose exactly how the pairs are divided; the industry convention is that hyperscalers get four to six pairs each for a two-party cable of this size, with remaining capacity sold into the wholesale market. The wholesale capacity on Echo is operated by third-party capacity brokers who sell to non-hyperscaler customers such as regional ISPs, content-delivery networks, and cable-backhaul consortia.

What Echo means

Echo is part of a broader reshuffling of the Pacific cable network. Google alone has Junior, TPU, Apricot (with Meta and others), and Echo in various stages of operational life. Meta has a similar portfolio. Chinese state-aligned operators have their own cables. The net effect is that the trans-Pacific submarine cable market is now crowded, with multiple hyperscaler-private and consortium systems competing for the same data flows. A decade ago, Trans-Pacific capacity was scarce and expensive; today, it is abundant and the bottleneck has moved to the terrestrial side, where fibre into inland US and Asian data centres has to be upgraded to keep up with cable capacity.

For Palau, Echo is quite possibly the most important piece of infrastructure the country will see this decade. For Google and Meta, Echo is one of several redundant paths. The asymmetry of those perspectives is itself the story of hyperscaler-era submarine cables: what is routine for the builders is transformative for the smallest landings.

Try it yourself

Live latency data on the Echo cable page. For related cables see Apricot (Google + Meta + partners, 2025) and TPU (Google private, 2026). Our measurements refresh every two hours.

📡 Health

Status✓ Normal
Last checked2026-05-23 20:30

Monitored using RIPE Atlas probes. Open monitoring →

📊 RTT History

Health Timeline

Thu, May 21
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
14ms → 613ms (44.10×)
05:00
Sun, May 10
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
7ms → 265ms (36.42×)
03:30
Fri, Apr 17
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
4ms → 12ms (3.29×)
00:30
Wed, Apr 15
View full event log →
Eureka
RTT Spike
248ms → 581ms (2.34×)
08:31
Mon, Apr 13
View full event log →
🔗
Hop Anomaly
12ms → 80ms (6.82×)
18:30
🔗
Hop Anomaly
10ms → 80ms (8.20×)
12:30
🔗
Hop Anomaly
8ms → 78ms (9.68×)
06:30
🔗
Hop Anomaly
8ms → 84ms (10.36×)
03:01

FAQ

Who owns and operates the Echo submarine cable?
The Echo submarine cable is jointly owned by Google and Meta. It is currently in service.
What year did the Echo cable go into service, and when was it built?
Echo went into service in 2025. The construction of the cable began before this date, but the exact build year is not specified.
Can you describe the route and key landing points of the Echo cable?
The Echo cable runs from California to Indonesia, with additional landings in Guam (twice), Palau, and Singapore. It provides direct connections between these locations.
What is the fiber pair count for the Echo cable, and what technology does it use?
The Echo cable consists of 12 fibre pairs. The specific technology used is not detailed but is designed to support high-capacity data transmission.
Is there any notable incident or cut related to the Echo cable that I should know about?
There are no widely known incidents or cuts reported for the Echo cable at this time. It has been in service without significant disruptions since 2025.
Echo
  • Length17,184 km
  • StatusIn Service
  • Ready for Service2025

Calculate Cable Distance

Find the actual cable routing distance between any two cities

Open Calculator →
🌊 Submarine cables 🛤 Land fiber 📡 RIPE Atlas

🌐 Log In

Access your routes, favorites, and API key

Create account Forgot password?